Archive for June, 2009

Temecula Real Estate – Shadow inventory?

Wednesday, June 17th, 2009

There is evidence that the banks may be “cookin the books” again when it comes to their inventory of foreclosed homes. As a First Time Homebuyer you should be concerned because there is a HUGE disparity between the number of homes that have been foreclosed and the number actually on the market.

If the banks are holding back on the available homes they are artificially inflating values and the home you are thinking about buying may be worth less in a few months if they do release this “shadow inventory”.

Here are some excerpts from an article that originally appeared on http://exiledonline.com/

Contrary to just about every single economic metric — rising unemployment, rising credit card debt, falling production, spiraling real estate values — people are optimistic. The recession is yesterday’s news, everyone’s moved on. People are actually believing the hype and getting into real estate again. And anyway, how the hell can we talk about real estate when America is torturing people and still not closing Guantanemo!

Well, the real estate industry is fine with us not paying attention. Because it has a dirty little secret that shows just how (messed up) our economy really is, and how insolvent they really are.

Fact is, banks all across the nation are keeping foreclosed properties off the market. They’re doing it on purpose, to fudge the statistics and make it seem like everything’s alright.

The San Francisco Chronicle:

Lenders nationwide are sitting on hundreds of thousands of foreclosed homes that they have not resold or listed for sale, according to numerous data sources. And foreclosures, which banks unload at fire-sale prices, are a major factor driving home values down.

“We believe there are in the neighborhood of 600,000 properties nationwide that banks have repossessed but not put on the market,” said Rick Sharga, vice president of RealtyTrac, which compiles nationwide statistics on foreclosures. “California probably represents 80,000 of those homes. It could be disastrous if the banks suddenly flooded the market with those distressed properties. You’d have further depreciation and carnage.”

In a recent study, RealtyTrac compared its database of bank-repossessed homes to MLS listings of for-sale homes in four states, including California. It found a significant disparity – only 30 percent of the foreclosures were listed for sale in the Multiple Listing Service. The remainder is known in the industry as “shadow inventory.”

The number of foreclosures is not going to decrease any time soon. Sean O’Toole, Founder and CEO of ForeclosureRadar.com, told me that out of the 9 million mortgages in California, 2 to 3 million are upside down, which means their houses are worth less than what they owe on the bank. On top of that, anywhere from 700,000 to 900,000 households have stopped making payments and somewhere around 250,000 are scheduled to be foreclosed.

This adds up to a staggering number: a total of 3 to 5 million homes, one quarter of the 12 million households in California, are going to flood the market very soon. Nationwide, there is a two-year supply of unsold homes, twice what official statistics estimate.

To put it simply: banks are limiting supply in order to keep inflating the bubble. Keeping properties off the market makes sense for two reasons: it allows banks to engage in another round of brazen ripoffs by selling at least some of their properties at artificially high prices to a new wave of sucker investors (many of which are first-time home buyers). But more importantly, it allows the banks to avoid recording a loss on their balance sheets, making them look more profitable then they really are

It looks like the banks are all in on this racket together. Earlier this year, the industry had accounting rules changed to make this kind of market manipulation possible (meaning, profitable.) That’s what those new “mark-to-model” accounting rules back in April were all about. Instead of having the market determine prices, the changes allowed banks to value their assets based on a future projected worth to be determined by the banks themselves.

The change was pushed through with an aggressive lobbying campaign by the financial industry. For a measly $30 million in lobby fees, banks inflated their worth by tens of billions of dollars, instantly. Wells Fargo said the change boosted its capital by $4.4 billion in the fist quarter. In the second quarter, it is expected to increase banks’ earnings by an average of 7%.

It might be legal now, but it’s still fraud and flagrant market manipulation.

Here’s an account by the WSJ of how it went down:

The rules had required banks, securities firms and insurers to use market prices to help assign values to mortgage securities and other assets that don’t trade on exchanges — to “mark to market.” But when markets went haywire last fall, financial firms complained that the rules forced them to slash the value of many assets based on fire-sale prices. That contributed to big losses that depleted their capital and left several of the nation’s largest firms on the brink of failure.

Earlier this year, financial-services organizations put their lobbyists on the case. Thirty-one financial firms and trade groups formed a coalition and spent $27.6 million in the first quarter lobbying Washington about the rule and other issues, according to a Wall Street Journal analysis of public filings. They also directed campaign contributions totaling $286,000 to legislators on a key committee, many of whom pushed for the rule change, the filings indicate.

Rep. Paul Kanjorski, a Pennsylvania Democrat who heads the House Financial Services subcommittee that pressed for the accounting change, received $18,500 from coalition members in the first quarter, the second-highest total among committee members, according to Federal Election Commission records. Over the past two years, Mr. Kanjorski received $704,000 in contributions from banking and insurance firms, the third-highest total among members of Congress, according to the FEC and the Center for Responsive Politics.

The one obvious connection that is not being made is that this change in accounting, linked up with the shadow real estate inventory, is the shady base supporting our entire economy. Without the new rules, banks wouldn’t be able to pad their books in order to appear profitable. And without fudging the numbers, banks would never pass Geithner’s “stress test” or ever hope to to appear even slightly solvent.

It’s a twisted sort of logic, but it’s legal. It’s also very frightening. To think that all these empty homes I see around me are what’s keeping the US economy from total meltdown… If they had For Sale signs on them, the economy would tank even further. For now, these zombie homes don’t officially exist.

Ain’t the free market great?

SOURCE: http://exiledonline.com/

Please comment and share with your friends and other First Time Homebuyers.

  • Share/Bookmark

Mortgage Rates Head for 6 percent: 5 Reasons They Might Retreat

Tuesday, June 16th, 2009

I received an email today asking when rates were going back down. My initial response was “If I knew, I could retire to my own private island in the Pacific” but it was a legitimate question that deserved an answer.

The answer is: NOBODY KNOWS! There are a lot of people with an opinion but nobody knows for sure.

Waiting for interest rates to go down is a risky proposition for two reasons:

1) It might not happen

2) If you wait too long the $8000 tax credit may be gone and waiting to save  a quarter of a percent in interest rate isn’t worth the potential money in your pocket.

There is however, one constant in interest rates: They will do one of three things: 1. They can go up  2. They can go down 3. They can stay the same.

In only one of the three scenarios, can you get better than what is being offered today. How much of a gambler are you? It’s your money.

All that being said here is one “expert’s” opinion: (If you really want to know what I think, go to the end of the post)

Only a couple of months ago, exceptionally low mortgage rates were one of the few optimistic landmarks in an otherwise bleak economic outlook. After the Federal Reserve unveiled a series of initiatives beginning last fall–such as purchasing Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac mortgage-backed securities and long-term treasury bonds–mortgage rates plunged to all-time lows. In early April, with 30-year fixed mortgage rates dropping to less than 5 percent, President Barack Obama beseeched homeowners everywhere to capitalize on the development by refinancing their mortgages. “The main message we want to send today is there are 7 to 9 million people across the country who right now could be taking advantage of lower mortgage rates,” the president said, according to the Associated Press. “That is money in their pocket.”

But in recent weeks, mortgage rates have spiked. And today, they represent perhaps the most menacing obstacle to the federal government’s efforts to revive the housing market and pull the economy out of its devastating rut. Rates have surged from 5.03 percent on May 26 to 5.79 percent on June 10, according to HSH.com, as mounting concerns over government spending and potential inflation have sent yields on 10-year treasury notes–which fixed mortgage rates typically track–barreling towards 4 percent. In just 2½ weeks, much of the Federal Reserve’s work to drive rates lower has unraveled.
Higher mortgage rates undercut the recovery in a number of ways. First, they drive housing costs up, which limits buyer demand and threatens to drag already falling home prices even lower (although even at 5.79 percent, mortgage rates are still phenomenally low from a historical perspective). But it’s the refinancing market that really gets hammered since higher rates destroy many homeowners’ incentives to restructure their mortgages. Last week, spiking rates sent refinancing applications plummeting to their lowest level since November 2008, according to Bloomberg News. That means fewer Americans will be able to reduce their mortgage bills, preventing monthly savings that could have enabled them to pump more cash back into the economy. “Whatever you hear in the media about the potential negative implications of 6 percent conforming rates on the mortgage refi arena … multiply it many times over,” wrote Mark Hanson, a managing director who handles real estate and finance research at the Field Check Group, in a report yesterday. At the same time, banks–which still face a long road back to health–may see less revenue from this business line that helped them fatten profits in the first quarter.

Despite the current surge, some experts say there is reason to believe that mortgage rates could reverse course in the near future, returning to the more attractive levels of a few weeks back. “It’s not real logical that mortgage rates are climbing–it’s not like we are out of the recession or the economy has changed dramatically,” says Guy Cecala, publisher of the trade publication Inside Mortgage Finance. “I don’t think it’s unheard of to say that sometime this summer we are going to see rates back below 5 percent.”
Here are five factors that could drive mortgage rates lower in the near future:
1. Government intervention: In an effort to reduce rates, the Federal Reserve could always intervene again. “There is still a reasonable probability that the Fed will raise or significantly increase its commitment to buy treasury bonds and Fannie and Freddie bonds,” says Mark Zandi, the chief economist at Moody’s Economy.com. Such an intervention could certainly push rates down in the short term, but it could also backfire by fueling additional concerns about inflation. And if an expanded effort fails to keep mortgage rates lower, the Fed could find itself in a serious lurch. Still, Zandi says it’s a risk that the Fed may have to take. “The risk of them not doing it is greater than the risk of them doing it,” he says.
2. Data dive: The relative improvement of recent economic data–which has fueled optimism for a recovery–is also partly responsible for the rise in mortgage rates. “The data is not good yet, but it is at least less bad,” says Richard Moody, the chief economist at Forward Capital. Over the fall and winter, 10-year treasury yields were depressed by the economic panic that boosted demand for ultrasafe government debt. But a growing sense of confidence has directed many investors to more risky assets like stocks instead of treasury bonds. As a result, treasury yields have increased, pushing mortgage rates higher. However, if future economic reports come in weaker than expected, investors could return to the safety of treasury bonds. “For example, next month’s job numbers are probably going to be measurably worse than the last one,” Zandi says, adding “and that will be a reminder” that the economy’s troubles are not over yet.
3. Stock market tumble: Since early March, the stock market has been in the swings of a surprisingly resilient rally, with the Dow Jones industrial average up roughly 33 percent over this period. But should stocks start tanking again, mortgage rates could retreat, Cecala says. “One thing that people don’t factor in is when the stock market tends to do better, mortgage rates tend to go up,” he says. “[If] the rally stalls–or if we have one or two days where we have a 100-point drop or more–you are going to see treasury rates and mortgage rates decline quickly. Investors will flock to the bond market.”
4. Exit strategy: Much of the upward pressure on 10-year treasury yields–and therefore mortgage rates–has been fueled by concerns about the mountain of government debt required to finance Uncle Sam’s massive bailout and stimulus programs. But Keith Gumbinger of HSH.com argues that if the Obama administration would outline a potential exit strategy for these commitments–perhaps indicating that not all of the funds would be deployed should the economy revive sooner than expected–the upward pressure on treasury yields could moderate. “If there was any expression of when these supports would be pulled, under what terms and conditions they would be pulled, and how we would rein in these really jaw-dropping deficits going forward, I think you would find that the markets would react positively to that,” he says.
5. Competition: Cecala also notes that an absence of competition in the mortgage market has enabled lenders to expand the difference or “spread” between the yield on 10-year treasury notes and mortgage rates. “Historically, the spreads between the 10-year treasury [yields] and 30-year mortgage [rates] are unusually large now,” he says. “That partly reflects the fact that we don’t have a competitive mortgage market.” But with refinancing applications dropping, Cecala says competition in the mortgage market could heat up, with lenders reducing these spreads to attract more customers. “The mortgage industry has spent a good part of this year trying to ramp up their mortgage operations to take advantage of the [refinancing] boom,” he says. “I don’t think they want that to go away, and they can be more competitive on rates than they have been.”

I promised my opinion on interest rates: “Maybe they will, maybe they won’t go down” but I prefer not to gamble with my money because if I guess wrong I’ll be paying for it for 30 years.”

 

  • Share/Bookmark

10 Things you need to know about the $8000 tax credit

Tuesday, June 2nd, 2009

Here are the 10 things you need to know about these changes:

1. The IRS tax credit refund can be made only to the taxpayer and not a third party.

2. Government agencies may offer tax credit advances with second liens.

3. The buyer cannot get cash back through the tax credit advance.

4. The 2nd lien may not exceed the down payment, closing costs, and prepaid expenses.

5. The 2nd lien may be “soft” or require payments.

6. Payments on 2nd liens must be included in ratios unless deferred for at least 36 months.

7. Balloon payments on 2nd liens may not be before 10 years.

8. FHA approved lenders and FHA approved non-profits may purchase the tax credit.

9. Tax credit purchaser may not charge more than 2.5% of the tax credit as a fee.

10. IRS may deduct from the tax credit: unpaid student loans, tax liens and garnishments.

Unless you are using State Housing Finance funds or certain non-profit organizations, you will still need to come up with the 3.5% down payment. FHA unlike most other loans will allow you to receive a gift of down payment funds from a family member (Bank of Mom and Dad).

Teri and Mark, clients of mine, received a gift from the Bank of Mom and Dad to purchase their first home. Even though there was “no expectation of repayment”, Teri and Mark amended their 2008 Federal Tax Return, received the $8000 within about 60 days and repaid Mom and Dad.

The Tax Credit is still a great vehicle for First Time Homebuyers and if you have down payment it can cover your closing costs or discount points to enable you to get a lower monthly payment.

 

  • Share/Bookmark